IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com


ADD A NEW IDEA

Operational

Showing 19

Have different display options for Investigation Reports, specifically the Lead Time so rather than displaying in days we would want to see this in hours

Currently Lead time shows in days and seeing 0.1 days isn't necessarily useful when we want to know lead time in hours
6 months ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Allow functionality to navigate left/right in a data table using keyboard keys, specifically in the case selection page.

Currently in 5.7 you can navigate up/down/left/right in any data table using the keyboard keys however in 6.3 you can only up/down on the overall page with the keyboard, you cannot up/down/left/right in a table result. The main place we would like...
about 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 1 Future consideration

Increased functionality of the "Close to" and "Not Close to" operators

When using the "close to" operators in a condition, would like the ability to specify whether or not the tolerance is only positive or only negative, in addition to the current setting which always works in both a positive and negative direction.
about 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Allow CPP Change on Bulk Transition

We use CPP tags to show which investigator is assigned to a case, even if that investigator was not the last one to transition the case. When an investigator conducts a bulk transition, they are not able to change the CPP tag through the bulk tran...
over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Random Sampling of Alerts

Allow for random sampling of alerts from the case selection page. We conduct monthly QA processes that require us to pull a random selection of cases worked by each investigator. Currently we need to download all alerts worked by an investigator a...
over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Element to Element Compare using substrings

Allow references to specific byte ranges within an attribute for comparison. For example, consider building a counter with the intent of identifying a BIN attack/Credit Master attack/enumeration attack. Generally speaking, these attacks will origi...
over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Separate the Intercepted by existing rules row within rule generation.

We identified in May that the “Intercepted by existing rules” row within the rule generator does not appear to be functioning correctly. Rather than providing stats surrounding transactions which were intercepted by the model revision, it actually...
over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Masked Data Customization

Allow more customization around which users can view the values of each encrypted attribute. This is currently handled at the user account level and a user may either view all encrypted/masked values or none of them. We need additional flexibility...
over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Schedule to run a rule over a certain period of time

We are looking for a way within Safer Payments to batch rules over historic transactions. We basically want to schedule to run a rule over a certain period of time. Essentially we are looking for rules that do not trigger as transactions come in, ...
over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

Allow rules to add entries to risk lists with dynamic filter criteria

When an entry is added to a risk list via a rule, filter criteria defined as part of the risk list is static. For example, if an account number is added to a risk list which has filter criteria defined as "Merchant State equal to [Destination Stat...
over 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.