Skip to Main Content
IBM Data Platform Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com



ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Search results: Spectrum LSF

blimits command functionality improvements

Affected: Administration and all users. Benefits: Provides clients with greater visibility into job availability and limitations, as well as a more dynamic way to allocate resources. Details: blimits functionality needs to be more encompassing. Gr...
2 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Other Future consideration

Enhancement request to lsfproxyd

We have workfloads from dozen of users which continously generating very high and sustained job submission requests. Whenever they are starting their work, the grid may grind down to a halt or very slow to process any other request. We want a tier...
4 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Other Future consideration

Enhance LSF daemon intellegent cpu binding

Currently Qualcomm manually configure LSF daemon cpu daemon cpu binding. They are looking to LSF intelligent daemon cpu bind feature. But using numa maps command, it doesn't show optimal allocation. Sometime the memory is not on the same numa.
27 days ago in Spectrum LSF / Administration Future consideration

Ability to disable job requeuing in google resource connector when jobs exit with TERM_RC_RECLAIM

We have jobs that should not be requeued after partially running due to corrupting the job output data. We would like to have a queue level parameter to disable requeuing of jobs that exit for TERM_RC_RECLAIM. To be consistent with other features,...
11 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Cloud Bursting Future consideration

add 'default account name' field for a user to store account used for LSF jobs submission & Licenses.

Hello, in current RTM version (v10.2.0.14), it's not possible to define a default account name (used to submit LSF jobs) per RTM user. Is it possible to add such field in the user record to ease the end-user usage. is it also possible, like for em...
over 1 year ago in Spectrum LSF / Operations/RTM Future consideration

Add to the elastic index lsf_job_acct a field that will save memory limit set to a job

Adding this data to elastic will enable us in a simple way to find jobs with memory limit higher than memory requested and to check actual usage of memory
2 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Reporting/Explorer Future consideration

Queue level cgroup enablement

Hi - we have a large cluster that services many different types of workloads. To better "bucket" these workloads, we have queues set up with rules that define how the jobs must run (or be submitted). One problem we have is that some of the workloa...
8 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Administration Future consideration

Make vm_type details in lsb. Acct file

vm_type is field is available only on event file . Can this be made available for Acct file as well? We extract lot of job information from Acct file so it will be good if we get vm_type details in the same file
almost 2 years ago in Spectrum LSF / Other Future consideration

Composite License Packaging for Simplified Allocation

Introduce a capability in IBM LSF License Scheduler to define a single package name that represents multiple license features. When this package is allocated, all underlying licenses are automatically allocated together. This would be similar to h...
4 months ago in Spectrum LSF / License Management Future consideration

bhist - Add support for customized output format ("-o" option)

Some LSF CLI commands support customized output format ("-o" option). For example, bjobs command:bjobs -o "JOBID USER JOB_NAME START_TIME" Currently "bhist" command doesn't support "-o" parameter and it would be appreciated if it can be added in t...
9 months ago in Spectrum LSF / Administration Future consideration