Skip to Main Content
IBM Data Platform Ideas Portal for Customers


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data Platform organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com



ADD A NEW IDEA

Search results: Swift

Showing 7 of 1093

Generate UETRs for MX during MSIF sending, not in the MER Data Entry (DNIMX&DNIFINPLUS)

1. For T2 MSGs that we enter in DNIMX domain the field for UETR is not mandatory so we can leave it empty but when we send the MSG from MER to InterAct and to SWIFTNet the UETR is not calculated and field PmtId – UETR is empty even if we put CD co...
over 4 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 5 Future consideration

Add SERVICE_CODES and BRANCH_QUALIFIER (from BicDir VALUE-ADDED SERVICES and EXTRA INFORMATION) to Reference Data- Bank data on Administration and Operation screens

Users need to know if BIC is connected or not to Swift and which services it uses
over 2 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 2 Delivered

We would like to have FTM in High Availability

In an HA environment with 2 FTM SWIFT nodes there is a restriction to have a single copy of the FTM SWIFT code in a shared library /usr/lpp/IBM/ftmswift/v300, visible from both LPARs
over 6 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 0 Not under consideration

Include the SWIFT GPI Usage Identifier and Service Level Code in FTM

The GPI MX Type that is supported by FTM on FP10 is as per listed. 1. trck.001.001.02 - swift.gpi.gcct.01 - G001 2. trck.002.001.01 - swift.gpi.gcct.01 - G001 3. trck.003.001.02 swift.gpi.01 - G002 Please include the following GPI MX Type 1. trck....
almost 2 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 3 Delivered

CBT automatic reconnect according to SWIFT "best practice"

We faced in production an abort of our FIN LTs with SWIFTs abort reason codes saying "Regional Processor is being shut down". After discussions on PMR 40488,311,75 and a parallel case with SWIFT, it is clear that SWIFT does not document this abort...
over 6 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 1 Not under consideration

MT604 and MT605 field 23 (DELIVERY/ TRANSFER)

For field 23, Either create a drop-down that accepts only TRANSFER and DELIVERY or it allows only TRANSFER and DELIVERY keywords. Current FTM allows users to enter anything within 16 character, when wrong code is entered, no error prompt to stop t...
over 4 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 0 Not under consideration

FTM-MER should be able to handle this double slash (//) checking

FTM-MER should be able to handle this double slash (//) checking In existing Merva users are required to key in a double slash '//' at the beginning of each account number. In FTM this is not required anymore but since the users are used to keying...
over 4 years ago in Financial Transaction Manager  / Swift 1 Not under consideration