IBM Data & AI

 Welcome to the IBM Data & AI Ideas Portal for Clients! 

We welcome and appreciate your feedback on IBM Data & AI Products to help make them even better than they are today!
Before you submit an idea, please perform a search first as a similar idea may have already been reported in the portal.  If a related idea is not yet listed, please create a new idea and include with it a description which includes expected behavior as well as why having this feature would improve the service and how it would address your use case.
IBM Employees:
Clients:
  • Our team welcomes any feedback  and suggestions you have for improving our offerings / products!  This forum allows us to connect your offering / product improvement ideas with IBM product and engineering teams.
  • If you have not registered on this portal please click on the following link and register.  To complete registration you will need to open the email you will receive from Aha to confirm your identity. http://ibm.biz/IBM-Data-and-AI-Portal-Register
Additional Information:
  • The shorter URL for this site is: https://ibm.biz/IBM-Data-and-AI-Ideas
  • To view our roadmaps: http://ibm.biz/Data-and-AI-Roadmaps
  • Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases
  • Please do not use the Ideas Portal for reporting bugs - we ask that you report bugs or issues with the product by contacting IBM support.

Enhance availability of readahead performance details

With the ubiquity of intelligent storage, the value of readahead in the Informix server is reduced and excessive readahead can be detrimental to performance. However, since the introduction of the AUTO_READAHEAD parameter and the associated changes to the readahead algorithms in the engine that include readahead of data that was not included in earlier versions of the engine, not all readahead details are exposed for analysis making it impossible to tune the AUTO_READAHEAD setting accurately.

Also while some details are available through the onstat -g rah output, not all values are exposed there either and none of that information is available through the SMI interface. Only the even more limited details exposed by onstat -p are available in sysmaster.

  • Art Kagel
  • Dec 3 2019
  • Needs review
Why is it useful?
Who would benefit from this IDEA? Database administrators on large complex systems.
How should it work?

Expose counts of all data read-ahead as well as counts of the number of readahead pages actually used/accessed either for reading or writing. It would be a nice-to-have to have exposed these values by pagesize/bufferpool in addition to overall values for the server instance.

Idea Priority Urgent
Priority Justification Many many customers are configured to either perform excessive RA or insufficient RA and have no way to judge.
Customer Name B&H Photo, Equifax, Material Logic, Walmart, The Home Depot, Cisco, all clients!
Submitting Organization
Submitter Tags
  • Attach files
  • Guest commented
    December 04, 2019 13:58

    The fact that the additional details are not included on the onstat output simply means that when the feature was added, someone neglected to include the additional stats in the monitoring.   So I'd vote Yes, if only to keep the onstat up-to-date with the available features.

     

    Question: Are these additional details available in Sysmaster?  And documented?  A feature undocumented is a feature denied!

NOTICE TO EU RESIDENTS: per EU Data Protection Policy, if you wish to remove your personal information from the IBM ideas portal, please login to the ideas portal using your previously registered information then change your email to "anonymous@euprivacy.out" and first name to "anonymous" and last name to "anonymous". This will ensure that IBM will not send any emails to you about all idea submissions