IBM Data and AI Ideas Portal for Customers
Hide about this portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against products and services offered by the IBM Data & AI organization. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:


Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,


Post your ideas

Post ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

IBM Employees should enter Ideas at https://ideas.ibm.com


ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Safer Payments

Showing 13

New API operation for fraud marking a record in the whole cluster

The existing markFraud API operation receives as an input a URID that is specific of the API instance that will process this operation. This creates a possible information gap if the API instance that will process this operation is different from ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

Hide model components from users authorized only to use lower mandators

In large customers such as payment providers and banks usually setups go by multichannel -> channel -> department/customer. These institutions often want to have their centralized sets of rules and profiles that check the transactions indepe...
over 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Business 0 Submitted

Quick search on entries over all monitoring/defined risk lists

In case you make intensive use of monitoring / defined risk lists and have many of em it is a lot of manual work to check if a given attribute/value is on which list or on which list and if the entry is still enabled/valid. Show me all defined ris...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Business 0 Submitted

Allow configuration of minimum and maximum value caps for attributes.

Output attribute values are currently only limited by the byte length defined, which allows very limited control over the values delivered downstream from Safer Payments. As a result, our team has to build individual rules for each attribute needi...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

Allow relative time frame/data range in Report Definitions

Report definitions in Safer Payments only allow for a fixed time frame definition (i.e. from 2023-06-08 00:00:00 to 2023-06-09 00:00:00). At the same time Safer Payments can generate reports through a scheduled job, i.e. once per day. The job-gene...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

Ability to restrict usage of an attribute defined at upper level mandator in lower level mandators in the mandator hierarchy

Currently client users can use all the attributes defined on the root mandator on rules and investigation queries . Certain attributes are defined at the root level are purely internal and we want to restrict the visibility and usage of this attri...
over 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

Better support for modern occ communication (i.e. case actions) patterns (REST/OAuth)

Topic of this request are the "case actions" (occ communication) from Safer Payments to any external systems to send/receive data from a cases. Mainly it focuses on the lack of abilities for the “HTTP method” message type that lacks any modern fea...
over 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Technical 0 Submitted

Add Group By query type to Simulation queries.

Ad hoc and other similar queries available for Simulation data are limited to a configurable number of records allowed. As a result, it is not always possible to get back all of the data of interest in a single Simulation query while also maintain...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

Allow inclusion of sub-mandator model(s) in upper-mandator simulations.

For those using a multi-mandator structure, it is currently possible to include model components from an upper-mandator when running a simulation on the sub-mandator due to the inheritance feature. However, it is not possible to do the opposite: i...
about 1 year ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

Queries Privilege's

It is very often in day by day job to run queries for several reasons and events. This action bust be limited to the specific user. If the query is saved everyone have access to that.
about 2 years ago in IBM Safer Payments / Operational 0 Submitted

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.